<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Machine with SMB and NFS  Shares</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/</link>
	<description>technologist defying the peter principle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-54031</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-54031</guid>
		<description>Rajeev,
What are your entries in your /etc/exports file on OSX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajeev,<br />
What are your entries in your /etc/exports file on OSX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom&#039;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time Machine backup via NFS</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-43904</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom&#039;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time Machine backup via NFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-43904</guid>
		<description>[...] References: Macworld;rajeev.name; levelofindirection.com  Category: Uncategorized    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.   Leave a Reply [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] References: Macworld;rajeev.name; levelofindirection.com  Category: Uncategorized    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.   Leave a Reply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Groves</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-42761</link>
		<dc:creator>John Groves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-42761</guid>
		<description>The problem with time machine on a non-HFS+ (mac native file system) volume is the lack of a feature they added specifically for time machine: directory hard links.  Any directory (or top directory of a nested hierarchy) which contains no changes will be hard linked to the same directory in the previous time machine backup.  This is arcana beyond most users, but file systems normally support hard links to files but not directories (and a hard link amount to the exact same file [inode] being linked into more than one directory, or under more than one name within a directory).

The comment above from &quot;burner&quot; is related to this point.  A DMG file with an HFS+ file system mounted from it would support directory hard links, but an NFS or CIFS mount most definitely will not.

If anybody is running Time Machine on an NFS mount I suspect that either 1) it is not working, or 2) it is consuming dramatically more capacity than would be needed on an HFS+ time machine volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with time machine on a non-HFS+ (mac native file system) volume is the lack of a feature they added specifically for time machine: directory hard links.  Any directory (or top directory of a nested hierarchy) which contains no changes will be hard linked to the same directory in the previous time machine backup.  This is arcana beyond most users, but file systems normally support hard links to files but not directories (and a hard link amount to the exact same file [inode] being linked into more than one directory, or under more than one name within a directory).</p>
<p>The comment above from &#8220;burner&#8221; is related to this point.  A DMG file with an HFS+ file system mounted from it would support directory hard links, but an NFS or CIFS mount most definitely will not.</p>
<p>If anybody is running Time Machine on an NFS mount I suspect that either 1) it is not working, or 2) it is consuming dramatically more capacity than would be needed on an HFS+ time machine volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Machine na zdalnym dysku pod WIN</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-35953</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Machine na zdalnym dysku pod WIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-35953</guid>
		<description>[...]          chocia?by to: Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares · Rajeev Karamchedu  pe?no tego w sieci.         MBP 13&quot; c2d 2.53, 4gb, 250gb, Snow Leopard 10.6.5               [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]          chocia?by to: Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares · Rajeev Karamchedu  pe?no tego w sieci.         MBP 13&quot; c2d 2.53, 4gb, 250gb, Snow Leopard 10.6.5               [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burner</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-30566</link>
		<dc:creator>Burner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-30566</guid>
		<description>The only safe way to use TM over NFS or SMB shares, is to create a large enough .dmg partion-image on the share, mount the image locally and use that as your Time Machine drive.
Be warned....
Do NOT use any other partitions than native OSX hfs or hfsplus for TM backups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only safe way to use TM over NFS or SMB shares, is to create a large enough .dmg partion-image on the share, mount the image locally and use that as your Time Machine drive.<br />
Be warned&#8230;.<br />
Do NOT use any other partitions than native OSX hfs or hfsplus for TM backups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odpowiednik Time Capsule ?</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-30000</link>
		<dc:creator>Odpowiednik Time Capsule ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 09:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-30000</guid>
		<description>[...]          Nie tylko po AFP. Prosz?: Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares  Time Machine Over the Network with iTimeMachine         MBP 13&quot; c2d 2.53, 4gb, 250gb, Snow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]          Nie tylko po AFP. Prosz?: Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares  Time Machine Over the Network with iTimeMachine         MBP 13&quot; c2d 2.53, 4gb, 250gb, Snow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hebben &#187; Bestanden delen tussen Windows en Mac met TimeCapsule</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-6332</link>
		<dc:creator>Hebben &#187; Bestanden delen tussen Windows en Mac met TimeCapsule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-6332</guid>
		<description>[...] 3) Windows Home Server Ook met bijvoorbeeld de Windows Home Server kun je bestanden op een eenvoudige manier? bereikbaar maken voor zowel Windows als Mac-machines. Net zo gebruiksvriendelijk, en met extra mogelijkheden dankzij slimme plugins. Het nadeel van zo&#8217;n server is wel dat de backup-mogelijkheden van TimeMachine dan niet zo makkelijk via het netwerk verlopen. Lees dit epistel.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3) Windows Home Server Ook met bijvoorbeeld de Windows Home Server kun je bestanden op een eenvoudige manier? bereikbaar maken voor zowel Windows als Mac-machines. Net zo gebruiksvriendelijk, en met extra mogelijkheden dankzij slimme plugins. Het nadeel van zo&#8217;n server is wel dat de backup-mogelijkheden van TimeMachine dan niet zo makkelijk via het netwerk verlopen. Lees dit epistel.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josema</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-6305</link>
		<dc:creator>Josema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-6305</guid>
		<description>In Leopard 1.5.2 not work smb volumes. . .

The unit is show in time machine, but still &quot;preparing copy&quot;, and &quot;error&quot;. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Leopard 1.5.2 not work smb volumes. . .</p>
<p>The unit is show in time machine, but still &#8220;preparing copy&#8221;, and &#8220;error&#8221;. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emile</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>Emile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

Following your instructions, my SMB drive/share appears in Backup Disk list. Unfortunately Time Machine still doesn&#039;t work. A message appears on my screen (translated from Dutch language): &quot;The Backupdisk cannot be activated&quot;.

Any ideas about how to solve this problem?

Some details:
- I have a MacBook;
- My network is wireless;
- And the network attached storage is an Iomega Home Network Drive.

Thanks,
Emile

PS. I am fairly new to the Mac OS. I just bought my first MacBook four weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Following your instructions, my SMB drive/share appears in Backup Disk list. Unfortunately Time Machine still doesn&#8217;t work. A message appears on my screen (translated from Dutch language): &#8220;The Backupdisk cannot be activated&#8221;.</p>
<p>Any ideas about how to solve this problem?</p>
<p>Some details:<br />
- I have a MacBook;<br />
- My network is wireless;<br />
- And the network attached storage is an Iomega Home Network Drive.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Emile</p>
<p>PS. I am fairly new to the Mac OS. I just bought my first MacBook four weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirkus Maximus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making Apple's "Time Machine" Work The Way You Want It To</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-5669</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirkus Maximus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making Apple's "Time Machine" Work The Way You Want It To</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-5669</guid>
		<description>[...] First and foremost, props to Rajeev for posting this. Well done, sir. Check the original post here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First and foremost, props to Rajeev for posting this. Well done, sir. Check the original post here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to improve Time Machine &#124; Rick Tech</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-5665</link>
		<dc:creator>How to improve Time Machine &#124; Rick Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-5665</guid>
		<description>[...] backups or force an immediate backup, nor does it backup NFS or SMB mounted drives, at least not easily.In addition to the above options all centrally located in Time Machine preferences, I want several [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] backups or force an immediate backup, nor does it backup NFS or SMB mounted drives, at least not easily.In addition to the above options all centrally located in Time Machine preferences, I want several [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajeev karamchedu</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4914</link>
		<dc:creator>rajeev karamchedu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4914</guid>
		<description>Felix&#039;s comment has an invalid link.. &lt;a href=&quot;http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5918065&amp;#5918065&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s the actual link where he found out how he was unable to get the space reclaimed using SMB file share.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix&#8217;s comment has an invalid link.. <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5918065&amp;#5918065" rel="nofollow">Here</a>&#8216;s the actual link where he found out how he was unable to get the space reclaimed using SMB file share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>Do not used TM on an SMB partition.

See my post on this thread...

http://discussions.apple.com/thread....918065#5918065

You have been warned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not used TM on an SMB partition.</p>
<p>See my post on this thread&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread....918065#5918065" rel="nofollow">http://discussions.apple.com/thread&#8230;.918065#5918065</a></p>
<p>You have been warned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajeev karamchedu</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4675</link>
		<dc:creator>rajeev karamchedu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4675</guid>
		<description>Once you get the new HD, you must install the OS and perform the trick again to allow the new OS to see the backup drive. You can restore your applications/data from the backup then. 

In other words, it does not create a bootable volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once you get the new HD, you must install the OS and perform the trick again to allow the new OS to see the backup drive. You can restore your applications/data from the backup then. </p>
<p>In other words, it does not create a bootable volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freek</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator>Freek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4669</guid>
		<description>I wonder what happens if you have a HD crash. Will you be able to do a system restore from the SMB drive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what happens if you have a HD crash. Will you be able to do a system restore from the SMB drive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My del.icio.us bookmarks for December 5th through November 5th-- Tales of a Minnesota Geek</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4210</link>
		<dc:creator>My del.icio.us bookmarks for December 5th through November 5th-- Tales of a Minnesota Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4210</guid>
		<description>[...] the occasional blog &#124; Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the occasional blog | Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajeev karamchedu</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4181</link>
		<dc:creator>rajeev karamchedu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4181</guid>
		<description>That does look very interesting! This could be a very cool combination if I can get crashplan to install on my NAS box (ReadyNAS). That is technically another computer :)

I was looking for a Crashplan free vs CrashPlan paid version differences. Is there such a thing ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does look very interesting! This could be a very cool combination if I can get crashplan to install on my NAS box (ReadyNAS). That is technically another computer :)</p>
<p>I was looking for a Crashplan free vs CrashPlan paid version differences. Is there such a thing ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4165</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 05:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4165</guid>
		<description>Interesting alternative to time machine:

http://www.crashplan.com/features/timeMachine.vtl

It&#039;s cross platform, and has many more features while remaining quite easy to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting alternative to time machine:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crashplan.com/features/timeMachine.vtl" rel="nofollow">http://www.crashplan.com/features/timeMachine.vtl</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s cross platform, and has many more features while remaining quite easy to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My del.icio.us bookmarks for November 4th-- Tales of a Minnesota Geek</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/comment-page-1/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>My del.icio.us bookmarks for November 4th-- Tales of a Minnesota Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2007/11/03/time-machine-with-smb-and-nfs-shares/#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>[...] the occasional blog &#124; Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the occasional blog | Time Machine with SMB and NFS Shares &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

