<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: categories like free tagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rajeev.name/2006/08/27/categories-like-free-tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rajeev.name/2006/08/27/categories-like-free-tagging/</link>
	<description>technologist defying the peter principle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajeev karamchedu</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2006/08/27/categories-like-free-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>rajeev karamchedu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 12:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2006/08/27/categories-like-free-tagging/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I am still unable to reconcile the useful differences between tags and categories. Another way to achieve the hierarchical categories  is to have a concept of &lt;em&gt;nested tags&lt;/em&gt;. 

To me, one big lure towards tags is the &lt;em&gt;internetization&lt;/em&gt; of it (&lt;em&gt;global&lt;/em&gt; is a more accurate word for it, I guess). Tags offer that relevant perspective to your posts that categories do not. 

We currently have the problem of duplicate tags already and its solution will truly be an &quot;one-size-fits-all&quot; one.

Tagories, Tagegories ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still unable to reconcile the useful differences between tags and categories. Another way to achieve the hierarchical categories  is to have a concept of <em>nested tags</em>. </p>
<p>To me, one big lure towards tags is the <em>internetization</em> of it (<em>global</em> is a more accurate word for it, I guess). Tags offer that relevant perspective to your posts that categories do not. </p>
<p>We currently have the problem of duplicate tags already and its solution will truly be an &#8220;one-size-fits-all&#8221; one.</p>
<p>Tagories, Tagegories ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Schinckel</title>
		<link>http://rajeev.name/2006/08/27/categories-like-free-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Schinckel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 03:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rajeev.name/2006/08/27/categories-like-free-tagging/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I like the idea of being able to create a category on the fly.  Lots of times I&#039;ve had to create a new category because I suspect this will be the first post of many on a similar topic.

I guess I like categories because I&#039;m a hierarchical thinker - I have categories inside categories, and in them, even more categories.  This is partly so I have a manageable list of parent categories.  Although, there isn&#039;t good facility for having a link in Blogsome of the child categories.  I&#039;m still working on that one.

I&#039;m not so sure about a system-wide bucket, however.  Particularly if they auto-complete.  This could create a huge server load, for one, and two I might have to type more characters to get the tag-egory I want.  Especially if some dim-wit spelled Psychology as Psychologie, for instance.  Which would appear in an auto-complete list first.  Having the ones you have used appear first could alleviate this.

I&#039;ve been using the web interface more than an offline editor lately, and with the jstools I updated I&#039;m pretty happy with that.  It&#039;s certainly possible to improve the category list, including adding the ability to add new categories.  Perhaps using XMLHttpRequest.  I did do this type of thing to allow me to delete comments from a post page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I like the idea of being able to create a category on the fly.  Lots of times I&#8217;ve had to create a new category because I suspect this will be the first post of many on a similar topic.</p>
<p>I guess I like categories because I&#8217;m a hierarchical thinker &#8211; I have categories inside categories, and in them, even more categories.  This is partly so I have a manageable list of parent categories.  Although, there isn&#8217;t good facility for having a link in Blogsome of the child categories.  I&#8217;m still working on that one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about a system-wide bucket, however.  Particularly if they auto-complete.  This could create a huge server load, for one, and two I might have to type more characters to get the tag-egory I want.  Especially if some dim-wit spelled Psychology as Psychologie, for instance.  Which would appear in an auto-complete list first.  Having the ones you have used appear first could alleviate this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using the web interface more than an offline editor lately, and with the jstools I updated I&#8217;m pretty happy with that.  It&#8217;s certainly possible to improve the category list, including adding the ability to add new categories.  Perhaps using XMLHttpRequest.  I did do this type of thing to allow me to delete comments from a post page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

